Payments and receipts
Hilt is strongest after payment, when the merchant can answer buyer questions from one place. The core loop is:- the payment
- the member record when access is involved
- the receipt
- the support thread when a conversation needs to continue
Payments show the commercial event
Use Payments to answer:- what was paid
- which template was used
- what asset was used
- when the payment confirmed
- what the next click should be
Members show the access outcome
Use Members to answer:- who the buyer is
- whether access is active
- when access renews or expires
- whether delivery needs attention
Receipts show the proof trail
Receipts are the verification layer:- transaction reference
- public proof link
- downloadable PDF proof
- invoice metadata
- template context
- buyer-facing and support-facing proof
- search by receipt, transaction, wallet, or product
- attach invoice details to the receipt record
- open the public proof page
- generate a PDF proof document
- send the proof link directly to the buyer
The right investigation sequence
When a buyer says something feels wrong:- find the payment
- open the related member record if access is involved
- open the receipt
- confirm what was purchased and what happened afterwards
- open Support if the issue needs a human conversation trail
What each page is best at
| Page | Best question to answer |
|---|---|
| Payments | Did the buyer pay, with what asset, and when did it confirm? |
| Members | Did the buyer receive active access, and does it need follow-up? |
| Receipts | What proof can the buyer or support share externally? |
| Support | Where should the human conversation live if the normal path broke? |
When the buyer needs the next concrete action
If the issue is not just proof, the merchant flow should stay operational:- retry delivery from the member or support view when access did not land
- inspect subscription status when a recurring buyer needs the next access step
- send the receipt proof directly when the buyer only needs evidence

